Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot
- From: "Michael's Mailing List Account" <mtd-list linux-shell net>
- To: Eskil Heyn Olsen <deity dbc dk>
- cc: Trever Adams <trever_Adams bigfoot com>, gnome pilot list <gnome-pilot-list gnome org>, calendar-list gnome org, recipient list not shown:
- Subject: Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:43:02 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Eskil Heyn Olsen wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Trever Adams wrote:
>
> > I believe the GnomeCal format currently keeps a timestamp on the record
> > allowing it to say if it is new or not. Why not add another line that
> > shows that the record has been deleted. After a decent amount of time,
>
> That option has been discussed, but raised some issues ;
> 1) what is a reasonable amount of time ? (yes, the same problem occurs in
> the other solution)
I saw one message that suggested 1 week. That is too short. Think of
what happens when you are on a 1 or 2 week "competerless vacation."
-Michael
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]