Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot

On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Eskil Heyn Olsen wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Trever Adams wrote:
> > I believe the GnomeCal format currently keeps a timestamp on the record
> > allowing it to say if it is new or not.  Why not add another line that
> > shows that the record has been deleted.  After a decent amount of time,
> That option has been discussed, but raised some issues ;
> 1) what is a reasonable amount of time ? (yes, the same problem occurs in
> the other solution)

I saw one message that suggested 1 week.  That is too short.  Think of
what happens when you are on a 1 or 2 week "competerless vacation."


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]