Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot
- From: Eskil Heyn Olsen <deity dbc dk>
- To: Erik Bågfors <bagfors pdc kth se>
- cc: gnome pilot list <gnome-pilot-list gnome org>, calendar-list gnome org, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:41:11 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Erik Bågfors wrote:
> what happens if you move back and fourth between two different calenders
> (one at home and one at work for example) will a slow sync still happen?
Yes, as the pc's have (or at least should have) different SyncPCId's.
> deleted it was still in the database. When the program looked in the
> databas and found it but didn't find it in the vcal-file it knew it was
> deleted.
Yes, this is basically the delete-purge scheme that would be preferred
(since I'd have to code less, and the evolution hackers more, and it'd
keep down the complexity).
> I can't see how this can be to slow.. maybe it's a bad hack but I don't
> think so. All you would have to do is create a small file with all the
> id's of the vcal-events and you are set to go.
Keeping it seperate won't be slow. The slowness was having base A on the
pilot, base B with deleted items on the PC, and having to traverse A,
comparing agains B to detect deleted items.
/dev/eskil
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]