Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot

On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, brian moseley wrote:

> as discussed on this list a few months ago, this is the
> reason that the TOMBSTONE property was proposed for
> icalendar. im not sure if the actual proposal made it into
> the ical rfc or if its buried in the cap draft somewhere.
> nevertheless, its a /much/ preferable method to running yet
> another daemon.

Tell us more! (I can guess that it's mark-as-deleted and later purge
stuff). I've browsed through the rfc's (2445 till 2447), but I've been
unable to find anything about this problem.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]