Re: LibICal license

["David Fallon" <dfallon ucla edu>]

Don't forget the LGPL - this is a much less invasive option that is closer
to the MPL and yet still GPL compatible - esp. since this is a library
anyways...

:) Of course, the GPL is preferrable...

----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel@gnu.org>
To: <eric@softwarestudio.org>
Cc: <calendar-list@gnome.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 12:45 PM
Subject: LibICal license


>
> Hello Eric,
>
>    We are interested in using the libical library in the GNOME system
> for our calendar application.  GNNOME is a project to bring
> productivity applications as well as missing architectures into Unix.
>
>    We do have a problem though, all of the GNOME code is written using
> the GPL or the LGPL code, and the MPL license is in conflict with
> this, would it be possible to dual license the code under the GPL and
> the MPL?
>
> Miguel.
>
>
> --
>         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>          To unsubscribe: mail calendar-list-request@gnome.org with
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>