Re: LibICal license

Don't forget the LGPL - this is a much less invasive option that is closer
to the MPL and yet still GPL compatible - esp. since this is a library

:) Of course, the GPL is preferrable...

----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel de Icaza <>
To: <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 12:45 PM
Subject: LibICal license

> Hello Eric,
>    We are interested in using the libical library in the GNOME system
> for our calendar application.  GNNOME is a project to bring
> productivity applications as well as missing architectures into Unix.
>    We do have a problem though, all of the GNOME code is written using
> the GPL or the LGPL code, and the MPL license is in conflict with
> this, would it be possible to dual license the code under the GPL and
> the MPL?
> Miguel.
> --
>         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at
>          To unsubscribe: mail with
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]