Re: [BuildStream] BuildStream "Conclave" in Manchester on October 2018 (week 42)
- From: William Salmon <will salmon codethink co uk>
- To: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan vanberkom codethink co uk>, buildstream-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [BuildStream] BuildStream "Conclave" in Manchester on October 2018 (week 42)
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:40:31 +0100
On 20/09/18 11:22, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 09:55 +0100, William Salmon via BuildStream-list wrote:
[...]
Can I suggest that a talk on architecture might be very helpful, I
believe an attempt at this was made at GUADEC but I can't find any
record of it.
A repeated issue seems to be patches not conforming to a Architectural
vision/plan, however I have found it very hard to understand what that
Architecture should look like, I think some more clarity on both how
things "currently work" but more importantly "should work" would make
writing and reviewing code much more productive.
Yes !
Adding to this, an outcome of the meeting I had with Jim and Jürg
today, is that:
* I will start by creating an architectural document which outlines the
modules, their responsibilities and their interactions, sans any
consideration for remote execution.
* Once I have done that, Jim and Jürg are going to fill in the bits
which pertain to remote execution.
* In Manchester, Jim, Jürg and I will sit down together for a few
hours with a whiteboard, and discuss what this should really look
like, and find holes in the plan.
As such, I think it would be best if this talk that you suggest come
later in the week, when a more clear picture can be presented.
Cheers,
-Tristan
This seems logical, however the earlier in the week it is the more time
there is for people to mull it over and seek clarification.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]