Re: [BuildStream] BuildStream "Conclave" in Manchester on October 2018 (week 42)
- From: Agustín Benito Bethencourt <agustin benito codethink co uk>
- To: William Salmon <will salmon codethink co uk>
- Cc: buildstream-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [BuildStream] BuildStream "Conclave" in Manchester on October 2018 (week 42)
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:48:19 +0200
Hi,
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 10:55:40 CEST William Salmon via BuildStream-list wrote:
On 19/09/18 12:22, Agustín Benito Bethencourt via BuildStream-list wrote:
Hi,
as you know, some of the people involved in BuildStream are distributed around the globe and some are
located in Manchester, UK. Since this year ELCE - OSS EU takes place in Edinburgh during week 43 we have
identified as an opportunity to modify the trip of some of those working remotely to be in Manchester the
week before this event, to work on BuildStream. This mail announces the organization of a "BuildStream
Conclave".
The following details has been confirmed:
* When: week 42
* Start: Tuesday Oct 16th morning
* End: Friday Oct 19th afternoon
* We will go from MAN to EDI by train on Sunday so, depending on the people coming, we can organise
something to do on Saturday.
* Where:
* Codethink (new) office. We expect to fit. If we do not, we will look for a suitable location.
* Agenda
* There will be a mix of coordination meetings, coding sessions, training sessions and lightning
talks/presentations.
* We do not have anything closed yet.
Can I suggest that a talk on architecture might be very helpful, I
believe an attempt at this was made at GUADEC but I can't find any
record of it.
A repeated issue seems to be patches not conforming to a Architectural
vision/plan, however I have found it very hard to understand what that
Architecture should look like, I think some more clarity on both how
things "currently work" but more importantly "should work" would make
writing and reviewing code much more productive.
I got the impression that the initial effort done at GUADEC on this regard was well received and we should
insist.
I also think we should go a step further compared to GUADEC. Any explanation about it should be recorded and
there should be material supporting it. It is a topic every new contributor will welcome. We can do a couple
of things:
* Have a presentation that is recorded.
* Have a working sessions to create/complete the current material.
The key for the success or these and other activities will be to work on them in advance.
Best Regards
--
Agustín Benito Bethencourt
Principal Consultant
Codethink Ltd
We respect your privacy. See https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]