Re: [Banshee-List] A song and dance about GSoC 2012

The bof is really a great document but not sure that data is up to date.
Some taks are finished and some are not applicable (Gobject introspection have a lot of GIR Parser (andrea, mike and alan have create a such tool) but none is used currently because it will bring regession because the current parser is better than gir file).

Mono.Upnp and Mono.DBus need some work before release.
I know that there is some change in garuma DBUS github which is not merged in main branch.

I guess we can order that in an excel file with priority/difficulty of the task.

we have new items here:

But to be honest I prefer that we pick a big task such as one of enhancement:;bug_severity=enhancement;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;bug_status=NEW;product=banshee

than a lot of small task because objective wsill be not clear.

Olivier Dufour

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:52 PM, olivier dufour <olivier duff gmail com> wrote:
XWT is not enough mature. A lot of things in not in XWT currently.
We will lost some important features because banshee use a lot of custom widget.

I have talk to luis this weekend and it need a gtk3 backend.
I offer my help for that but I need time for that.

For me the issue is not gtk3 backend but the lack of maturity and the regression we will get with it...

Olivier Dufour

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Andres G. Aragoneses <knocte gmail com> wrote:
On 02/06/2012 05:08 PM, gnomeuser gmail com wrote:
Porting relevant parts of the Banshee interface to XWT.

I would advice against doing this, first because it is no small task, and second and most importantly: AFAIK xwt only has a Gtk# 2.x backend in Linux (not Gtk# 3.x).




banshee-list mailing list
banshee-list gnome org  (unsubscribe here)

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]