Re: [Banshee-List] banshee 5th gen nano support (bugzilla 599051)



On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 16:27 +0100, David Nielsen wrote:
> 2010/3/29 <cruejones comcast net>
>         Thank Samuel.  I really don't want to have to switch media
>         manager at this point.  Does anyone
>         know what the development status of 5th gen support is for
>         Banshee or if Banshee is going to 
>         switch to libgpod when that will be?  Is there anything I
>         could do to help?
> 
> 
> A switch to libgpod has been proposed but it is a lot of work. Nobody
> has stepped up to do the work, and I understand that binding libgpod
> is going to be somewhat tricky. Thus no deadline can be offered so
> far.

There's been some activity recently on a C# binding to libgpod, as part
of libgpod itself. For now, it's available in a personal git branch :
http://gitorious.org/~teuf/libgpod/teuf-sandbox/commits/mono

I think testing of those bindings would be welcome, but libgpod
developpers might be able to provide more guidance :
http://www.gtkpod.org/libgpod/

-- 
Bertrand Lorentz <bertrand lorentz gmail com>
> http://bl-log.blogspot.com <

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]