On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 14:54 -0800, John Millikin wrote: > Having a standardized set of extension categories would be useful, > both as a guide to new extension authors and to reduce the set of > similar-but-different categories. The current set of extensions has 7 > categories , with 5 uncategorized extensions. Next to some I've added > the category that extension could be moved to. Anybody have ideas to > improve this? Additional categories, simplifications, categorizing the > unknown extensions, etc. > > Core > PlayerMigration > > Debug > SqlDebugConsole -> Developers > > Developers > BooScript > > Hardware > AudioCd -> Sources > > Sources > Sample > > User Interface > Lastfm -> Sources > Bookmarks > FileSystemQueue -> Sources > MultimediaKeys > PlayQueue -> Sources > Bpm > Podcasting -> Sources > InternetRadio -> Sources > NotificationArea > CoverArt > > required:User Interface > NowPlaying > NowPlaying.Clutter > > Uncategorized > MediaWeb > Template > Daap -> Sources > RemoteAudio > Torrent Looks like you missed the various extensions for DAPs : Dap, Ipod, Karma, MassStorage and Mtp. These could go into their own "Digital Media Player Support" category. I'd also like to mention the external extensions I know about, with category suggestions : Mirage -> Sources Alarm -> User Interface ? CovertArtWallpaper-> User Interface Lyrics -> User Interface ? Magnatune -> Sources I think we need a "catch-all" category for extensions that don't quite fit in any other category. Right now that would be "User Interface", but then it probably needs another name. Suggestions ? -- Bertrand Lorentz <bertrand lorentz gmail com> > http://flickr.com/photos/bl8/ <
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part