On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 23:59 -0500, Scott Peterson wrote: > I'm only just ran across the System.Uri type and was curious why we > use the custom SafeUri class instead. I'm not sure about the exact details, but I seem to remember that System.Uri, being based on what Microsoft made, also had to implement the bugs Microsoft introduced. SafeUri was meant to be compatible, but bug-free. -- Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv) http://www.savanne.be
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part