Re: [Banshee-List] Full vs Quick Library Rescans

From: "Benjamín Valero Espinosa" <benjavalero gmail com>
To: banshee-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Banshee-List] Full vs Quick Library Rescans
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:37:28 +0100

2008/12/23 Brandon Perry

Figured it would be best to discuss this over the mailing list before I opened an enhancement bug, just to get some input on it.

What do you think about having two types of library rescans? A "full" rescan that would drop the table in the SQLite db that has all the file paths and such in it and completely rebuilds that with the directory (ies) the user supplies and a quick rescan, which just scans for new music?

Just for curiosity, do you think the current scanning method is "full" or "quick"?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Banshee-List] Full vs Quick Library Rescans
  - From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Sawicz

References:
- [Banshee-List] Full vs Quick Library Rescans
  - From: Brandon Perry

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]