Re: [Patch] Improve generation of obfuscated message-id
- From: Pawel Salek <pawsa0 gmail com>
- To: Albrecht Dreß <albrecht dress arcor de>
- Cc: Balsa-Liste <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Improve generation of obfuscated message-id
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 17:33:56 +0100
On 12/23/2016 04:29:11 PM, Albrecht Dreß wrote:
Hi all,
a while ago we introduced obfuscated message-id headers (see bugzilla
#738155 and related messages in the balsa list).
The message-id now is basically a base64-encoded hash value, which
may contain the '+' and '/' characters explicitly allowed by RFC
5322. However, I noticed that if a DSN is requested, some MTA's seem
to use this message-id verbatim as ENVID parameter (see RFC 3461).
In this parameter, though, the '+' character is /not/ allowed and
must be escaped. As a result, the receiving MTA /may/ reject the
message if the ENVID contains an unescaped +.
Although this is a bug in the sending MTA, IMO it would be better to
adjust the way the message-id is created. The attached patch uses
the first 240 bits (30 bytes) of the random hash to create a somewhat
formatted, base32-encoded message-id (see e.g. in this message).
Opinions?
The goal seems sane. Have you got an idea how often the unwarranted
rejection occurs?
Pawel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]