Re: best mailbox format?

[Kacper Wysocki <kacperw online no>]

> Peter Bloomfield wrote:
>> It's been a long, slow job, but the mbox backend in cvs now seems
>> robust, and gives reasonable performance.

It's strange, but after running a couple of dozen tests on my 50mb mail  
folder, trying out MH, Maildir and mbox, mbox came out the fastest! For  
some reasons (cached data probably) opening the mailboxes took between  
3 and 5 seconds this time, with MH and Maildir doing 5 seconds and the  
mbox format doing 3 seconds. Hmm.

-Kacper

PGP signature