Re: segfault in balsa

[Steffen Klemer <masterofheap gmx net>]

Am 2004.04.27 07:58 schrieb(en) Kacper Wysocki:
> On 04/26/2004 10:07:52 PM, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
>> On 04/19/2004 06:35:13 PM, Kacper Wysocki wrote:
>> Closing messages is over-complicated in 2.0, and it's been cleaned up
>> in HEAD/2.1.  Is the `blam' reproducible in 2.0?  Have you seen it in
>> HEAD/2.1?
> 
> It's hard to reproduce. So should I crank up the mailbox closing  
> frequency and see if things break faster? I haven't had time to try 2.1  
> yet- it's been a crazy week and my discrete math class is going to kill  
> me. You can however count on me giving it some extensive testing once I  
> get the chance - I've been looking forward to head+gpgme for a while  
> now. How are the gpgme patches doing?

GPGME in HEAD works for me in a great way - at least as well as in 2.0.
Albrecht did a great job!

Only problem: you better have a recent cvs-snapshto of gmime :)

cu
/Steffen

-- 
 /"\
 \ /  ASCII Ribbon Campaign    |  "The best way to predict
  X  * NO HTML/RTF in e-mail   | the future is to invent it."
 / \ * NO MSWord docs in e-mail|                -- Alan Kay

PGP signature