Fwd: Re: Commiting failed msgs ? [mario mikocevic htnet hr]
- From: Carlos Morgado <chbm gnome org>
- To: Balsa List <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Fwd: Re: Commiting failed msgs ? [mario.mikocevic@htnet.hr]
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:51:04 +0100
- From: Mario Mikocevic <mario mikocevic htnet hr>
- To: Carlos Morgado <chbm gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Commiting failed msgs ?
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:58:59 +0000
Hi,
On 2003.09.25 12:50, Carlos Morgado wrote:
> On 2003.09.25 11:29, Mario Mikocevic wrote:
> > On 2003.09.25 12:16, Carlos Morgado wrote:
> > > On 2003.09.25 08:22, Mario Mikocevic wrote:
> > > > what exactly could activate msgs `Commiting mailbox xx failed.` ?
> > > > I'm getting that a lot and in different circumstances ..
> > >
> > > On what type of mailboxes are you getting that error ?
> >
> > Uh, there are _different_ types of mailboxes !? :)
>
> sure :)
omg, and I thought the world is so simple :)
> > Well, _all_ of my mailboxes are procmailrc-ed plain files.
>
> mbox ? (ie, not maildir or mh)
Yes
> > Balsa-2.0.14 has problems with empty open mailboxes and since I am still
> > not quite satisfied with 2.1.0 branch (.sig not including and not formating
>
> DON'T USE 2.1/HEAD FOR REAL STUFF. IT WILL EAT YOUR MAIL. You have been
> warned :)
Well, this msg is written with _the_ _latest_ CVS co rebuild !
And Yes, I've seen circumstances of eaten mailboxes with older CVS cos . :[
> > this is with 2.0.14 release, I stil have to confirm that with 2.1.0 !
>
> is Mbx1 open when you commit all ?
Yep, I never `close` mailboxes.
--
well, this sig is manualy typed 'cos it's still missing ..
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]