Re: Mailbox views

[Simon Brown <simon cliffestones demon co uk>]

On 2003.05.27 14:39, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> The handling of mailbox views has been changed in cvs.  Views are now 
> used to save the exposed and open state of each mailbox, and an IMAP 
> folder tree is now browsed deep enough to find mailboxes that were 
> exposed or open in the previous Balsa session (the scan depth restriction 
> is overridden to find them).  Of course, no mailbox is actually opened 
> unless the pref is set.

I'm guessing this:
gcc -DLIBMUTT                       -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED          -
DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED        -DGNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -I.. -I.. -I../
libbalsa  -I../libmutt -I../libmutt     -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/
glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/
include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/
usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/
linc-1.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 
-I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/
libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/
include/freetype2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/
include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-module-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtkhtml-
2.0   -I/usr/include/libgnomeprint-2.2 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/
include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/
include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomeprintui-2.2 -I/usr/include/
libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/
lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0    -Werror -Wall    -g -O2 -c 
folder-scanners.c
folder-scanners.c: In function `libbalsa_scanner_imap_dir':
folder-scanners.c:240: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will 
break strict-aliasing rules
folder-scanners.c:241: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will 
break strict-aliasing rules

is related to this change, I'm using gcc 3.3 on debian/sid which I imagine 
is the problem. Has anyone else seen this, should I open a bug?...

Simon