Re: Several balsa bugs I'm about to submit to bugzilla.
- From: Carlos Morgado <chbm gnome org>
- To: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Several balsa bugs I'm about to submit to bugzilla.
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:52:09 +0000
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:21:25, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
>
>
> save-message
>
> There should be a way to save a single message in raw format
> to a file, preferably in mbox format (meaning it should have
> an initial From_ line, that's all)
>
good point.
>
> imap-timeout
>
> If you don't access an opened but non-selected mailbox for a while
> and the remote IMAP server times out and closes the connection, balsa
> show an error if you try to open that mailbox again.
>
this is annoying but i don't think it will get fixed on balsa-2.0
> In my case it's even worse, my window manager handles mouse-over
> as "select window and raise" so if I move to the error message
> box to close it I pass over the information box, which is getting
> raised over the error box as a result, and you have to click on
> the error box first before you can close the information box - AARGH
>
humm, I was pretty sure the error is marked as modal - time to go check.
>
> imap-subscribe
>
> Right now the only way to subscribe to new IMAP folders is
> to go settings -> preferences -> modify -> un-select
> "subscribed folders only". Or you can right-click on the
> top container of the IMAP account and select "properties".
>
> Then Balsa becomes very slow as it scans the entire IMAP
> hierarchy and all folders and messages in it, before it
> comes back to life.
>
> It would be better if you could just right-click on the
> top container of the IMAP account and find a
> "subscriptions" menu that popped up a window with all
> the IMAP folders on the server and you could just
> select which folders are subscribed and which are not.
>
This is a good observation however in IMAP doing what balsa does and what you
are proposing is the same thing. Also, some imap servers are better than
others at this.
>
> folder-menu
>
>
> The options you get in the folder window when right clicking
> are confusing and should be more context-dependent. Right now,
> for example when selecting "new IMAP subfolder" it doesn't
> even remember where in the tree you clicked on it and you have
> to enter manually "create as subfolder of". And you can click
That is anoying yeah.
> on a local folder and get "new remote IMAP mailbox".
>
You start with local folders only - how do you add an IMAP mailbox ?
> First, the local folders should all be in a "local folders" tree,
> just like remote folders are in a "remote folder" tree. It
remote folders aren't in a remote folder tree, each imap server is a tree of
its own to represent the folder organization on server
> would be more logical and it would allow one to keep multiple
> folder collections. You would also be able to set the folder type
> for that tree (i.e. mbox, maildir, MH).
>
you can't just set the folder type! that means recreating the folder from
scratch!
> Then the right-click menu should just show:
>
> * When top-level or a folder is selected:
>
> - new subfolder (for something that contains mailboxes)
> - new mailbox (for a mailbox)
>
> * When a mailbox is selected:
>
> - rescan
> - properties
> - edit filter
> - delete
>
> - mark as Inbox/Sent/Drafts
>
> As you can see I left out the "new local mailbox / IMAP subfolder etc".
> That doesn't make sense. That should be in a seperate menu (see above).
>
You need to able to add single IMAP mailboxes, as oposed to folders. You also
need to be able to create new folders in servers.
Maybe the folder/subfolder nomenclature is a bit confusing and yes, it would
be a bit better if the new subfolder item was more context sensitive
> Same goes for "mark as Inbox/Sent/Drafts". That should also be in
> a seperate menu (settings -> preferences -> mail options -> outgoing),
> no need to clutter up the mailbox menu with that.
>
No. Inbox doesn't have anything to do with outgoing. Nor does Drafts.
"Mark as special mailbox" belongs in the mailbox menu.
> The "File -> New" hierarchy should look like this:
>
> - Local mbox folder set
this doesn't make sense, a "mbox folder set" is just a directory with mboxes.
> - Local maildir folder set
This doesn't exist.
> - Local MH folder set
Some MUAs can't see nested MH folders
> - Remote IMAP account
see above.
> - Remote POP3 account
>
> For the "local mbox folder set" the INBOX should be special
> cased, since unlike MH and Maildir the INBOX is usually not
> located in the directory all the other mailboxes are in.
>
Are you trying to group local folders by type ? I don't get it.
> Also, perhaps the folder-tree should have a root common to all local
> and remote folders/accounts that, when right-clicked on, shows
> the same File -> New menu.
>
>
I think have a hierarchy for local folders makes stuff harder to find. I'm a
great fan of alphabetical order.
>
> imap-new-folder
>
> If you create a new folder on an IMAP server you are not
> subscribed to it. If the IMAP account is set to show only
> subscribed folders, the new folder should be subscribed
> to automatically, otherwise you can't see it.
>
Good point.
>
> compose-prefs
>
> When composing a new message from the "compose" button, Balsa should
> use the properties (identity, etc) of the currently active folder.
>
This is commonly requested, sounds like a good idea.
>
> folder-prefs
>
> The folder preferences menu should have some extra options:
>
> - Standard Cc: / Bcc: / Reply-To: header settings
this is all part of identities
> - Possibility to add customized headers (X-whatever: yes)
this might be usefull for RIPE mail :)
> - (perhaps) Location of drafts / sent folder
>
Ok, Sent could be a Identities thing
>
> composer-include-file
>
> If you're in the message composer, and you open a file with
> File -> Include (or attach), Balsa doesn't remember the directory
> you selected. So if you select a directory 10 levels down your
> homedir, and you later want to attach another file from that
> directory, you need to navigate to that directory all over again.
>
Works for me (2.0.15-cvs)
>
>
> external-editor
>
> It would be great if Balsa could run an external editor in the
> standard compose window.
>
eeek!
> I'd be happy if it was somehow possible if, instead of the balsa
> editor, that window would include the 'zvt' terminal emulator
> and a text editor (for me, "vi", for others, perhaps pico, emacs or joe).
>
you can invoke whatever you told is the gnome text editor from the edit menu.
however, it won't be swallowed by the composer window.
> The "plugger" for mozilla appears to be able to embed one X
> application in the window of another. Perhaps that is a viable
> sample implementation to follow (so vim-gtk would work ;) )
>
> Or perhaps there is a standard Gnome way to do this kind of thing.
> I don't care, as long as I can use "vi".
Preferences->Preferred Applications->Text Editor
--
Carlos Morgado - chbm(a)ma.ssive.net - http://chbm.net/
0x1FC57F0A FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]