Re: [PATCH] GnuPG mode: balsa wrongly says that a signature is bad
- From: Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>
- To: Albrecht Dreß <albrecht dress arcor de>
- Cc: Balsa-Liste <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] GnuPG mode: balsa wrongly says that a signature is bad
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:06:38 +0200
On 2003.04.02 21:46, Albrecht Dreß wrote:
> Attached to this file is a "hotfix" for a bug in the GnuPG stuff...
>
> When a message with big attachments is both signed and encrypted,
> balsa might complain about an invalid signature even when it's
> actually valid. This was due to a bug in the conversion of line
> endings. This patch fixes that problem. Please apply my patch
> submitted on March 28th (btw, is that one ok, so it could go into the
> cvs?) *before* using this one.
>
> As usual, both patches are also available from my "Bals GnuPG page"
>
> http://home.arcor.de/dralbrecht.dress/balsa/balsa2-gpg.html
Both patches have been commited (+the sanitize stuff). Thanks a lot!
Pawel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
