Re: Reply-To header

[Brian Stafford <brian stafford uklinux net>]

On Thu, 21 February 08:09 David M. Stowell wrote:
> On 2002.02.20 14:12 Thomas Maeder wrote:
>> Am 2002.02.20 00:33 schrieb(en) Peter Bloomfield:
>>> 
>>> Why not use `Reply to Group'?
>> 
>> Because it doesn't work. Reply to Group leaves the To: header empty.
> 
> Yes it does - if the group address in in the To: field. I just used it for 
> this reply. It seems not to bring the address across if the group address is 
> in the Cc: field.

Omitting To: Cc: and Bcc: headers from a message is entirely legal according 
to RFC 2822.  A message is required only to provide originator fields and Date:

So balsa does nothing wrong when To/Cc/Bcc are empty provided the SMTP 
envelope lists the correct recipients.

Brian Stafford