Re: Balsa 2

[Emmanuel <e allaud wanadoo fr>]

On 14.02.2002 19:27 Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:56:17PM +0100, Ali Akcaagac wrote about 'Re:
> Balsa 2':
> > On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 18:41, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > You haven't heard from me in some while. I have done some more work
> on
> > > balsa 2, but still have probs with addressbookentry. Could I put my
> > > sources on a CVS server somewhere so others can look at them and help
> > > - that would improve the progress?
> > but this means it needs more than it gets right now:
> > - gconf support (not that i like it but it seem to be a must for
> gnome2)
> > - remove depracted librarycalls.
> > - ui polish etc.
> > - code polish.
> - code restructuring
> - speed optimization..

Yes I think that wherever the code is far too bad to be ported cleanly we 
should first try to make it better. This way I think that we gain for now 
and later.
A cvs branch would be good so that we can all look at your code and try to 
help (and learn gnome2 API ;-)


> > the only info i got so far is some stuff there some stuff here but no
> > real roadmap for balsa... what is going on right now any comments or
> > something ? i think a more serious attempt to get balsa moving is
> needed
> > than doing some tweaks there and here to get it running on gnome2.
> A (partial) rewrite of balsa would be needed indeed. But would it be
> wise to do that during the gnome2 porting?
> 
> Let's get the balsa2 CVS running...
> 
> Jelmer
> 
> --
> Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@nl.linux.org> - http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/
> Development And Underdevelopment: http://library.thinkquest.org/C0110231/
> Listening to Decipher 04
>  19:18:34 up 7 days, 13 min,  8 users,  load average: 1.19, 1.40, 1.11
> _______________________________________________
> balsa-list mailing list
> balsa-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
>