Re: new ver. of balsa?



On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 01:52:22PM +0200, Magick wrote:
> 
> 
> So if we are going to migrate the imap code, why not do that too with the 
> local mailbox handling. What i like to know is what is a good interface 

cause it's unneeded and painfull. local access dirty stuff is quite happy in
libmutt. so would imap and pop if we could get it to do async i/o


-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(at)chbm(dot)nu - http://chbm.nu/ -- gpgkey: 0x1FC57F0A 
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
Never settle with words what you can accomplish with a flame thrower.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]