Re: Build problems: C++ code in pspell and new RPM-SPEC files
- From: Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>
- To: Bjoern Voigt <bjoern cs tu-berlin de>
- Cc: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Build problems: C++ code in pspell and new RPM-SPEC files
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:25:41 +0200
On 2001.10.08 23:27 Bjoern Voigt wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Pawel Salek wrote:
>
> > What about attached configure? Does it detect properly pspell? (I
> > attach the configure.in.diff for completness).
>
> In addition I had to change the following things:
>
> 1) Running libtoolize (from libtool-1.3.5, SuSE 7.2)
> is also ok. But, why it's necessary to run libtoolize or autogen.sh
> on a distribution (balsa-1.2.0.tar.bz2, no CVS version)?
Thanks for verification. The patch on configure.in is for the developers.
It is not entire tarball.
> 2) Disabling iconv-checks
>
> I have iconv in glibc-2.2.2. But unfortunately configure doesn't
> detect this.
When you report problems with configure, please post relevant sections
from config.log.
> 3) Disabling libesmtp
>
> No idea. It already worked before.
Same as above.
> I don't know, why 2) and 3) is necessary. Probably everything has to
> do with incompatibilities of different versions of libtool, autoconf
> and automake. I have
>
> libtool-1.3.5-117
> autoconf-2.13-339
> automake-1.4-334
>
> (all original from SuSE 7.2). But, for instance, libesmtp want's to
> have autoconf 2.50 or higher. I would prefer it to find the required
> versions of Libc or libiconv, libtool, autoconf, automake and so on in
> the README.
I do not think this is true. I use
libtool-1.3.5-8
autoconf-2.13-10
automake-1.4-8
/Pawel
--
Pawel Salek, Theoretical Chemistry, SCFAB, Stockholm
http://www.theochem.kth.se/~pawsa/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]