Re: POP3 critical problem



On 2001.06.20 20:17:02 +0200 Jonas Anden wrote:
> > hmm well you may be right but i really dont want another library
> > or software package installed to get some more mails.
> 
> Don't know about the rest of the balsa users, but if balsa could use
> fetchmail libraries to provide stable pop3 functionality, I'm willing to
> add a tiny library to my system, so balsa developers can spend time on
> what is *really* important for a mail client - editing, queueing, and 
> presenting mail - instead of inventing the wheel all over again.
> 
> Fetchmail has stable support for transferring mail using encrypted
> channels, supports ETRN, authenticates usng KPOP, APOP, RPOP, etc.

ok as long as it goes for the linbrary i might agree but i dont want
to use fetchmail (itself) to get my mails..

so we might have a fetchmal frontend and esmtp backend.

> > otherwise i could use vim to answer my mail and sent them back
> > though sendmail because i dont see any further usage in balsa
> > then.
> 
> I'd say balsa looks a whole lot better than vim.

yeah but can balsa do this ?

s/^ //g

-- 
Name....: Ali Akcaagac
Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science
E-Mail..: mailto:ali.akcaagac@stud.fh-wilhelmshaven.de
WWW.....: http://www.fh-wilhelmshaven.de/~akcaagaa




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]