Re: IMAP check options



On 2001-08-14 11:38 Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> As I've had no suggestions about changes/improvements, this seems to
> be the final cut!
> 
> Rereading the patch raises the question of whether the changes in
> libmutt
> code should be protected by #ifdef LIBMUTT, to preserve both versions.
> What's your preference?

They should be protected by #ifdef LIBMUTT or at least marked with a
comment containing capitalized word BALSA. It makes eventual code
synchronization with mutt easier. /pawel
-- 
Pawel Salek (pawsa@theochem.kth.se) http://www.theochem.kth.se/~pawsa/
Theoretical Chemistry Division, KTH voice: +46 8 790-8202




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]