Re: Yet another alias-expand update.
- From: Pawel Salek <pawsa TheoChem kth se>
- To: Berend De Schouwer <bds jhb ucs co za>
- Cc: Balsa Mailing List <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Yet another alias-expand update.
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:05:42 +0100 (CET)
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Berend De Schouwer wrote:
> > I do have a question now though... I am subclassing gtkentry().
> > I would like to copy some code from gtk_entry to
> > libbalsa_address_entry, particularly parts of gtk_entry_draw_real().
> > GTK+ is licensed under LGPL, Balsa under GPL. My understanding
> > is that I can cut&paste from LGPL to GPL, but not GPL to LGPL.
> > Is this okay?
That sounds correct to me. LGPL is less restrictive than GPL.
Concerning the patch, I haven't really tried it yet but have comments from
the structure stand point:
1. move to subclassing gtkEntry is obviously correct but then focus_s and
next_in_line object data should become the class' fields.
2. but: I have impression gtkEntry has already a flag/status field that
says if the field has focus or not. Also, handling focus with next_in_line
is superflous, this task should be left to GTK (It also doesn't work very
well when some of the input fields are hidden, IIRC).
Does it sound convincing?
/Pawel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]