Re: Configuration

On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Walt Armour wrote:

> Hmmm...  Warning: non-procmail user here.  :)
> Anyway, the primary thing I was trying to avoid was requiring the user to
> configure other software packages in order to get their mail.  When I say
> 'transparent' I mean that Joe User should not have to worry about
> configuring/maintaining it.  If we can achieve this with the current
> procmail then perhaps we should use it.

Certainly, that kind of transparency is desirable.

I wonder if perhaps this is really the domain of a gnome-mail
configurator, which understands the chain


(Ie. sendmail-procmail-balsa, or exim-procmail-balsa)

and knows how to configure a few alternatives for each level.

OTOH, that's probably a fairly large project.  It may be the technically
neatest approach, though.


|  Jelibean aka  |         |  6 Evelyn Rd	       |
|  Jules aka     |              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   |        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
|  War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left.             |
|  When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy.          |

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]