Re: Configuration
- From: Jules Bean <jmlb2 hermes cam ac uk>
- To: Walt Armour <walt blarg net>
- cc: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Configuration
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:49:46 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Walt Armour wrote:
>
> Hmmm... Warning: non-procmail user here. :)
>
> Anyway, the primary thing I was trying to avoid was requiring the user to
> configure other software packages in order to get their mail. When I say
> 'transparent' I mean that Joe User should not have to worry about
> configuring/maintaining it. If we can achieve this with the current
> procmail then perhaps we should use it.
Certainly, that kind of transparency is desirable.
I wonder if perhaps this is really the domain of a gnome-mail
configurator, which understands the chain
mail-transport-agent
mail-delivery-agent
mail-user-agent
(Ie. sendmail-procmail-balsa, or exim-procmail-balsa)
and knows how to configure a few alternatives for each level.
OTOH, that's probably a fairly large project. It may be the technically
neatest approach, though.
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]