Re: Unidentified subject! (Two Balsas crash)
- From: Jules Bean <jmlb2 hermes cam ac uk>
- To: Phil Groce <phil_groce cmcsmart com>
- cc: Peter Williams <peter newton cx>, balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! (Two Balsas crash)
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 15:22:49 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Phil Groce wrote:
> At 12:08 PM 12/7/99 +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> >No, no, no. Please no!
> >
> >Running an application twice should run it twice. This is a real
> >operating system, not a toy one.
>
>
> Purely as an interested lurker (who's looking to become a tester/user as
> soon as the next version comes out)....
>
> If a user clicks on the app icon a second time, they may or may not know
> there's another instance out there. Why not pop a dialog that asks the user
> if they want to start another instance or work in the existing one? If the
> user selects to work in existing, bring the app to the foreground. I don't
> know if it should move to the current desktop, though....
>
> Personlly, I like the option to run multiple instances, but I don't want
> the app to assume I want that, because I usually don't with email.
>
Well, this is certainly the wrong forum for the discussion, so I'll pipe
down in a minute,
But basically, because that's not the unix philosophy. Imagine if it
asked you every time you ran two terminals, or to shells.
I quite often run two mail-readers (text-based ones) so I can read
different folders simultaneously. Also, if I'm away from my desk I can
telnet in and start a new session.
However, in some contexts, particularly if there are locking issues
involved, as there are here, a dialog box would be a sensible idea.
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]