Re: license for art's engine



Hello,

ext benjamin sipsolutions net wrote:
>>On 14 Oct 2005, at 9:59 am, Ferenc Szekely wrote:
>>
>>>I browsed thru the code I got from your CVS, but could not find an
>>>explicit license file or any indication about terms that we should
>>>agree
>>>to in order to re-use your software. Unfortunately our hands are tight
>>>and we need to clarify these terms before we can put anything to
>>>maemo.org.
>>>
>>>Would it be possible to attach some license file to the code? Or who
>>>could give us some "permission" in written?
>>
>>This is an important point, and if everyone who has contributed agrees,
>>I'd like to use the GPL for this. I'm open to suggestions on more
>>appropriate licenses however, as I know the GPL isn't always relevant
>>to PHP or web based projects (i.e. where the code isn't compiled, or
>>only services are provided).
> 
> 
> I am fine with the GPL.

GPL sounds very good! This would allow us to install and use your
great code and offer something new to the people interested in maemo.

When do you think you will agree on the license and check-in some
document to CVS (like a COPYING file)?

Regards,
Ferenc






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]