Re: license for art's engine

[benjamin sipsolutions net]

> On 14 Oct 2005, at 9:59 am, Ferenc Szekely wrote:
>> I browsed thru the code I got from your CVS, but could not find an
>> explicit license file or any indication about terms that we should
>> agree
>> to in order to re-use your software. Unfortunately our hands are tight
>> and we need to clarify these terms before we can put anything to
>> maemo.org.
>>
>> Would it be possible to attach some license file to the code? Or who
>> could give us some "permission" in written?
>
> This is an important point, and if everyone who has contributed agrees,
> I'd like to use the GPL for this. I'm open to suggestions on more
> appropriate licenses however, as I know the GPL isn't always relevant
> to PHP or web based projects (i.e. where the code isn't compiled, or
> only services are provided).

I am fine with the GPL.