Re: [xml] Probably should not look for/use shl_load if dlopen is found (2.6.17)

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:43:12AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> >># diff -c  xmlmodule.c.orig xmlmodule.c
> >
> >
> >  okay, makes sense. I made the changes, thanks !
> >  BTW patches are better sent as mail attachments so they don't
> >get messed up by the transport layers.
> 
> (BTW, I changed my subcription to rick jones2 hp com from 
> rick_jones2 hp com, so the approval stuff should no longer be an issue - 
> noticed it when I saw the delays.)
> 
> Inline vs attachements - every project seems to go differently there :( 
> Some lists strip attachments, hard to keep it striaght which is which.  All 
> thanks to that OS that can't seem to ever shake a cold (virus)... sigh.  
> I'll try to remember to do attachments in the future.

  okidoc, thanks !

> So, with those patches I get clean compiles for both 32 and 64-bit 11.11 
> and 11.23 IPF.  I can though generate beaucoup warnings if I enable all 
> warnings and migration (32 to 64-bit) warnings.  The bulk of them seem 
> harmless (having waded through them briefly) and some look like the 
> compiler being overly paranoid, but some may be of interest.  Would you 
> like to see the entire list (as an attachment of course :)?

  there was a guy from cea.fr who was posting all warning obtained 
by compiling on Solaris or HP-UX in bugzilla, good to have them there
and try to cleanup between releases, so yes sure !

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/