Re: [xml] Probably should not look for/use shl_load if dlopen is found (2.6.17)

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:51:22AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> On some HP-UX systems, both dlopen and shl_load are present.  The 2.6.17 
> configure script seems to look for both of them and then xmlmodule.c does 
> not prefer one over the other.
> 
> When both shl_load and dlopen are present, we get duplicate definitions of 
> the routines and that makes the compiler rather unhappy :)
> 
> I'm not sure which would be better - only have configure look for shl_load 
> if it does not find dlopen, or modify the #ifdefs in xmlmodule.c such that 
> the shl_load stuff is nested in an #else from the HAVE_DLOPEN.  This patch 
> does the latter - as much because I didn't have autoconf installed on the 
> HP-UX system as anything else :)
> 
> # diff -c  xmlmodule.c.orig xmlmodule.c

  okay, makes sense. I made the changes, thanks !
  BTW patches are better sent as mail attachments so they don't
get messed up by the transport layers.

thanks 

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/