[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[xml] Re: 'Re: "Re: [xml] usage of xmlReconciliateNs"'



Hi,

Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:58:25PM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
>>Hmm, but why does it remap namespaces which are already declared in the 
>>subtree? Those should not have any references to the old tree - only 
>>inside the subtree. And if this is intended, why does it not free the 
>>resulting "no more used" namespaces?
> 
> 
>   Hum, it should not operate that way, there is something wrong
> either in the code or in the way your tried to use it.
> 
> Daniel
> 

xmlReconciliateNS calls xmlNewReconciliedNs(doc, tree, node->ns) to 
search for existing namespaces; "tree" is the given top of the subtree 
and never changes, thus the search won't ever touch any of the declared 
namespaces *inside* the subtree.

Kasimier Buchcik




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]