[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: 'Re: "Re: [xml] usage of xmlReconciliateNs"'
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik 4commerce de>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: 'Re: "Re: [xml] usage of xmlReconciliateNs"'
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:17:56 -0400
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:58:25PM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > Basically the goal of xmlReconciliateNs is to fix the namespaces references
> > when a subtree is removed from a document and pasted into another one.
> > It will try to remap all the namespace in a coherent manner so that no
> > reference to the old tree still exists and preserve the namespaces
> > semantic on the new tree.
>
> Hmm, but why does it remap namespaces which are already declared in the
> subtree? Those should not have any references to the old tree - only
> inside the subtree. And if this is intended, why does it not free the
> resulting "no more used" namespaces?
Hum, it should not operate that way, there is something wrong
either in the code or in the way your tried to use it.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]