Re: [Vala] private fields vs bodyless properties

[Hans Vercammen <hveso3 gmail com>]

Hi Jürg,

Thanks again for clearing things up.

> For cases where this is a performance issue, we're improving the support
> for non-GObject (but still GType-registered) classes, which follow more
> closely the C# and Java construction scheme.

Will the non-gobject approach in the future provide oo paradigms which
are not limited to the gobject likings or should I see this differently?

Hans