Re: [orca-list] Vibuntu the most accessible Ubuntu Linux live cd




On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 09:39 +0100, James & Nash wrote:
Hi folks,

Just a quick question, eveytime there is a new release, how does the upgrade 
process work? Am I correct in thinking tha you have to burn the new release 
to a DVD or CD and then re-install the whole OS?

Thanks

James,
Although this is an off-topic question (and since I am the only one to
be moderated for such things ),I will give you a brief overview of at
least ubuntu.

in Ubuntu you have to dist-upgrade so that you ar eon the new system.

Do sudo apt-get update, sudo apt-get upgrade and then sudo apt-get
dist-upgrade in the same order as I gave you.

I don't know about other distros, but this will completely change you to
the new version.

happy hacking.
Krishnakant.

James
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel shellworld net>
To: "Tj" <kaiserdragon52 gmail com>
Cc: <orca-list gnome org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [orca-list] Vibuntu the most accessible Ubuntu Linux live cd


I downloaded this iso image and got it working quite quickly just by keying 
in the orca command after the disk action stopped.  It'll probably work 
better with orca --nosetup though.  That was way easier than earlier 
versions of ubuntu and required no sighted assistance.  The noteworthy 
accessability difference between this version of Linux and any version of 
windows is that when you get this one started you don't get a gelded screen 
reader; you get the whole screen reader.  A far better deal than windows 
narrator and it didn't cost U.S. $300.00 to download either.  I hope this 
version doesn't disappear.



On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Tj wrote:

Ok.  I'll speak my bit.

Not even 2 weeks before, I said "What the hell?" and found the Wubi
installer. I installed ubuntu, with very limited knowledge in linux (I've
taken an opperating systems class in 10th grade of highschool with 
gnopix,
if that tells you my limits), so I knew the basics like cd, md, ls, man,
yatta yatta.  But listening to Darragh's walkthroughs back in 8.04, and
8.10, I decided if I wasn't going to try it I'd never learn.  Then, 
Anthony
released Vibuntu.  Now, I know the orca can work with the panel menus, 
and
that pleases me.  It got to me knowing I couldn't do my admin settings 
stuff
like I could in windows, and not knowing the sudo commands to run in a
terminal to do things, I got kind of discouraged.  With my newbie 
questions,
I know I'll get the hang of it, and figure out how to make my vibuntu 1.1
release talk with those panel menues (I won't upgrade cause I've got 
stuff
that I don't want to lose and redo just now), however, if I get the
instruction I seak I won't have to.  Now, if there was a talking 
bootloader,
I'd be confident enough to run linux and windows side-by-side.  As it is
now, I still ahve to ask sighted people to assist me with the boot loader
(Tips welcome on how to use it).  But that'll just take memorization.  As 
it
is now, I'm beginning to like the free open-sourced OS that I never 
thought
possible to use.  As luke said, I didn't know how to get the ball rolling 
so
to speak.  With vibuntu, people like me can essentualy get their feet 
wet,
and move up to more customized distributions with more luck, and more
knowledge.  Or even make the one they ave do what they want.  It's an
awesome tool to have for someone like me.  I know from first hand
experience.  A friend and i took the challenge of learning linux 
together,
and I keep telling him to just use vibuntu until we know how to do the
things vibuntu does for us.  Then, we can learn and do what we want, and 
how
we want to do it.  For that, I can't thank Anthony enough.  I feel i'm
getting somewhere, and, who knwos.  I might be the next one saying, 
"What's
windows?"  I even got my own keystrokes to work.  Like control+alt+F for
firefox.  Go me!  Unfortunately, it's one of the things that are up in 
your
face, but it's a stepp up that mountain of learning I've still got to do.

Tj
----- Original Message -----
From: "luke Davis" <speakup lists tacticus com>
To: "Anthony Sales" <tony sales rncb ac uk>
Cc: <ubuntu-accessibility lists ubuntu com>; <orca-list gnome org>
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: [orca-list] Vibuntu the most accessible Ubuntu Linux live cd
for theVisually Impaired EVA III


I have avoided chiming in on this one to date, and I will probably avoid
it in future, but I wanted to say this...

I am a person who reads those stock and investment plan (some would say
scheme) newsletters, such as the stuff produced by the Sovereign Society
and S&A Research (basically the whole Agora family) for fun and 
amusement
(and the odd useful piece of investment information).

If you know what I'm talking about, then you know that I know whereof I
speak, when I say that I have seen copyrighting and "creative"
advertising, ranging from the absolutely absurd, to the world class.

While claiming Vibuntu as "the first fully accessible version of
Linux...", or variations on that phrase, is certainly hyperbolic and
rather overdone, it may have some effect with the target population. 
and
isn't that the point of marketing?  Getting a foot in the door?
I probably would not have said it, but then I have never been good at
selling things.

Systems like Slackware, and I think even Redhat, have been fully
accessible (or at least as accessible) for years, _if_ you knew how to 
get
started.

But that's the problem: if you need a howto in order to get it going, 
even
if it's a relatively short one, you're already behind the ball, in 
trying
to get your foot in the door.

I believe it can be said to be true that most blind people using 
Windows,
had a sightie do the installation. By the time the blind user got to the
system, it was likely already talking, or could be made so with relative
ease.

With Linux, having someone else do the install is rarely an option.  So,
you start out, when promoting it, in "catch up" mode.  Add to that, 
having
to go to some web site, and follow a possibly complex set of 
instructions
in a howto (complex to someone who has only ever used Windows, or never
used anything), when they have never actually heard of a HowTo, and 
aren't
convinced that "this Linux thing" is worth all the trouble, is not at 
all
a good beginning.

I have nothing invested in VIbuntu (except that I like the name:)), and 
am
not myself convinced that it is a necessary project on its own (I.E. 
that
it might not be better for it to either absorb, or be absorbed into,
another project).
I have seen (and been a part of) too many projects driven by a need and 
a
key personality (I.E. not driven by a team), that started out with a 
bang,
but then flamed out just when they had a chance, because they did not 
have
enough of a foundation in the community they existed to operate within 
and
support, so I am cautious.

However the need is real, and since this does seem, at least as I
understand the situation, to be a reasonable way of going about things 
for
a quick launch of a good idea (which, unlike many other good
ideas, has a substantive product behind it), I say why not?

Yeah it has bugs.  Yeah there are things I think could and should be
changed about the way it operates.  Yeah remastersys is probably not the
best way to roll a distribution.  Who cares?  It works, it is out there,
and it is constantly being worked on--I do not believe that the
self-proclaimed deluded megalomaniac has claimed that it is complete and
perfect yet.

Anthony may eventually decide to merge Vibuntu with something else.  We
may even discover that it does not appeal to the intended target 
audience
for what ever reason.
Ubuntu may even recognize the value in adding at least a beeping
bootloader, and a less tricky installation process for disabled users.
That would go a long way to eliminating the need for this project, I
think, and is probably the way I would rather see things go.

But so what?  Are we not all about offering alternatives and choices? 
Too
many choices can be a bad thing.  Are we even close to having too many
choices yet?

I have seen many people confused by which distribution to get into; but 
I
have seen more of them struggling through the trials of getting their
chosen distribution up and talking fully in a productive way, to think
that there is no value in what Anthony is doing.  "Put this CD in, boot 
it
up, and follow the spoken or brailled or magnified instructions", is not
usually the response given to such questions.  Maybe soon it can be.

That is probably simplistic--one must still understand partitioning and
multi booting and such, but that is well documented in simple ways.  To
me, the holy grail of Linux deployment is "it just works".

Am I likely to use VIBuntu for anything other than a lark, or to aid 
with
development?  No.  I've been using Linux for twelve or more years, and
unixes longer than that.  I'm used to the hardships and hitches, and
know where to find help, and what questions to ask.  but then, it wasn't
meant for me, was it?

Regards,

Luke


On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Anthony Sales wrote:

Hi Tom, its the self-deluded megalomaniac who thinks he has solved all 
of
the
world's problems with a simple remix of Ubuntu. I think the key here is
to
remember that this distro is not really aimed at Linux users at all - 
but
visually impaired users who maybe haven't even heard of linux before. I
am
trying to 'sell it' (for free remember) to teachers, trainers, colleges
and
institutions in the UK who probably have never heard of or used Linux
before.
When promoting something it is usually to emphasise its strengths 
rather
than
weaknesses. No one is going to sell many cars if they use the slogan,
'its
OK, its pretty much like other models really'. In the same spirit that
Carlsberg claim to brew 'probably the best larger in the world', I have
claimed to have produced 'the first fully accessible version of Linux 
for
visually impaired users who have never used Linux before'. It has
certainly
got peoples attention and a bit of a debate going! You know that I 
don't
take
myself that seriously, but I think you would have to agree that 
Vibuntu,
even
though it still needs lots of work, is probably the only Linux distro
that
you or I know of that could be booted and experimented with by someone
with
no experience of Linux, who would have no chance of being able to
configure
it themselves without support and/or sighted help. I think a lot of
people in
the Linux VI community forget just how difficult it is to get into 
Linux,
and
the fact they they are so technically competant themselves etc makes 
them
lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of VI users are not 
hackers
and
have no ambitions to be so. They just want to browse the web, send a 
few
e-mails or write a letter etc. If Vibuntu helps just a few people kick
their
dependancy on microsoft than I will consider it a time well spent. 
(What
would you rather be doing - translating T3 scripts into Welsh or
tinkering
with Ubuntu?) Yours in humble modesty, drbongo.


-----Original Message-----
From: ubuntu-accessibility-bounces lists ubuntu com on behalf of Thomas
Lloyd
Sent: Sun 14/12/2008 22:02
To: ubuntu-accessibility lists ubuntu com
Subject: Re: Vibuntu the most accessible Ubuntu Linux live cd for
theVisually
Impaired EVA III

I also agree that the claim of the first accessible Linux is a tad far
fetched and maybe the most accessible Ubuntu Linux live cd for the
Visually Impaired. Is more accurate? We all fall victim to claims of
self grandeur at times, especially when it our baby.

I think that the proof is in the pudding as Tony has said himself the
community will decide. I have no issues with slightly misleading
marketing if it saves any disabled people money and opens up more
opportunity for them.

This is not to undermine what has been done in the past by other groups
and if there are better products for those people they will find them.
But we all need a starting point and if you are forced to spend a small
fortune to start on a computer many people who can, either can not or
don't.

So all in all keep up the good work make sure you add in a feature that
forces the user to change their password at least and maybe their
username after an install and I will stop worrying about security.

NL




_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca

_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at 
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Netiquette Guidelines are at 
http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions/NetiquetteGuidelines 

_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Netiquette Guidelines are at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions/NetiquetteGuidelines




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]