Re: GtkGC shared auto-release

[Kevin Ryde <user42 zip com au>]

muppet <scott asofyet org> writes:
>
> +	/* Rebless to Gtk2::GC, so that we get our DESTROY called */
> +	RETVAL = sv_bless (newSVGdkGC (gc), gv_stashpv ("Gtk2::GC", 1));

Could the DESTROY of Gtk2::Gdk::GC be pressed into service instead of
reblessing, to keep the return the same class as before?  If gdk code
linking/calling upwards to a gtk func is undesirable then maybe via a
function pointer hooked in by the Gtk2::GC code.