Re: GtkImageView

[muppet <scott asofyet org>]

On Dec 22, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 01:33 -0500, muppet wrote:
>
> > I think the secondary "void value not ignored as it should be"  
> > warning
> > was just fallout from the compiler being confused about the "void*"
> > pointer dereference.  (And, yes, i think we ought to change
> > Glib::CodeGen to fix this upstream.)
>
> Like so?
> <cast.patch>

Exactly like that.  :-)

Have you noticed any new compiler warnings with this?  I don't expect  
any, but there's always a chance...

--
Doing a good job around here is like wetting your pants in a dark  
suit; you get a warm feeling, but no one notices.
  -- unknown