[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: goocanvas vs crcanvas,which better?
- From: Dov Grobgeld <dov grobgeld gmail com>
- To: b3nder yandex ru
- Cc: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: goocanvas vs crcanvas,which better?
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:32:19 +0300
The following does it:
int img_width = gdk_pixbuf_get_width(pixbuf);
int img_height = gdk_pixbuf_get_height(pixbuf);
cairo_surface_t *surface
= cairo_image_surface_create_for_data(gdk_pixbuf_get_pixels(pixbuf),
CAIRO_FORMAT_ARGB32,
img_width,
img_height,
gdk_pixbuf_get_rowstride(pixbuf));
You will have to swap R and B in calls to:
cairo_set_source_rgba (cr, 0,0,1.0,0.5);
when drawing though, as cairo and gdk_pixbuf have different ideas about
their order.
(These examples are copied from the GtkImageViewer tutorial.)
Regards,
Dov
2009/3/26 Alexander <b3nder yandex ru>
> Hi, Dov.
>
> On Thursday 26 March 2009, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
>
> > - If the annotation is static, it certainly faster to prepare a
> > transparent pixbuf and draw the annotation on the pixbuf and then
> simply
> > merge the data from the frame grabber with the overlay mostly
> transparent
> > pixbuf, and then ship the result of to display.
>
> Is there standard facility for creating cairo context for pixbuf? Like
> gdk_cairo_create() for drawables.
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]