[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: xmgrace
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu>
- Cc: Alan G Isaac <aisaac american edu>, gnumeric-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: xmgrace
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:18:45 -0400
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:20:45PM -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>
> I'll put in my twopence-worth on this. I'm a gnumeric fan, but I have
> to agree with Andrzej's point that gnumeric's graphing capacities are
> quite primitive. And the response, that if we just wait a little
> these capacities will be terrific, without any need for third-party
> plugins, has worn thin over the several years I've heard it made.
It's sad but true that the charting engine lost on the order of 2
years of development, probably closer to 3 trying to go through
bonobo to guppi. It was the right choice at the time, but failed
miserably for a variety of social and technical reasons. Believe me
when I say that writing everything from scratch was not my first
choice. However, the price has been paid, and we've got a shiny new
engine now. It's fairly easy to add new capabilities to bring
things up to par with other applications.
> Alan refers to gretl's use of gnuplot. The code that supports that is
> under the GPL, so anyone who wanted to adapt it for use with gnumeric
> would be welcome to do so. (Gretl -- my baby -- sends data to gnuplot
> and gets it to produce a PNG file, which it then displays in a GTK
> window.)
Interesting. I wish I had known of that before writing all of this.
It may have changed the direction, probably now, but it is possible.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]