On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:20:45PM -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote: > > I'll put in my twopence-worth on this. I'm a gnumeric fan, but I have > to agree with Andrzej's point that gnumeric's graphing capacities are > quite primitive. And the response, that if we just wait a little > these capacities will be terrific, without any need for third-party > plugins, has worn thin over the several years I've heard it made. It's sad but true that the charting engine lost on the order of 2 years of development, probably closer to 3 trying to go through bonobo to guppi. It was the right choice at the time, but failed miserably for a variety of social and technical reasons. Believe me when I say that writing everything from scratch was not my first choice. However, the price has been paid, and we've got a shiny new engine now. It's fairly easy to add new capabilities to bring things up to par with other applications.