Re: kB, MB or KiB, MiB
- From: Daniel Nylander <info danielnylander se>
- To: GNOME I18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: kB, MB or KiB, MiB
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 19:17:34 +0200
Sven Neumann skrev:
> Could you please point me to this discussion?
No, since I was just guessing.
> Might be more correct, but I don't think it would be more appropriate.
> While kB, MB and GB are common and well-known abbreviations, KiB, MiB,
> GiB and the like are not widely used and would confuse most users. I
> even had to look this up on Wikipedia because I don't think I've ever
> seen MiB and GiB being used anywhere.
You are correct, it's more correct but maybe not appropriate.
As I translator, I have started to notice that more and more
applications start to use this new convention. For the beginning I was a
bit negative but started to like it more and more. But yes, it might be
confusing for some people.
For more information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1541
(as you can see, this is for recommended use)
--
Daniel Nylander (CISSP, GCUX, GCFA)
http://www.DanielNylander.se
Stockholm, Sweden
info danielnylander se yeager ubuntu com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]