[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.12.2 Is A BIG Dissapointment



OK.  To break a few rules and start a holy war, I really dislike the way
this list is configured to reply to sender instead of list by default
(and I am top posting to make this point.)  I participated in this
thread and since most subscribers reply to all to insure replying to the
list, I am getting 3 copies of each post.

I am sure there is someone who will disagree, but I can't imagine why
this is a good thing.

I know that ctrl+L is supposed to reply to list only, but a lot of
subscribers don't and some people monitor this list in an MUA other than
evolution.

Thanks for indulging this rant.


On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 01:02 -0500, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 00:42 -0500, Rick Bilonick wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 21:04 -0700, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> > > Hello Rick,
> > > 
> > > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution-exchange?view=revision&revision=1502 i suppose this commit would set the junk filters up again.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > --Bharath
> > 
> > Sorry, but I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.
> 
> The Spam filtering in Exchange was broken since 2.11.4 when a lot of
> optimizations fixes were put in. The link mentioned above shows the
> revision in which it was fixed and committed. Once tested and all
> regressions are fixed, it will be committed to Stable. Just wanted to
> bring to your notice that its been fixed in the later versions.
> > 
> > Rick B.
> > 
> Thanks,
> --Bharath
-- 
Art Alexion
Resources for Human Development, Inc.          215-951-0300 x3075
4700 Wissahickon Ave.                                 art rhd org
Philadelphia, PA 19144                                www.rhd.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]