Re: [Evolution-hackers] Future of eds bindings



On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:09 +0200, Muelli wrote:
> Hey :)
> 
> On 15.08.2008 12:01 vseguip gmail com wrote:
> > The second approach would be writing
> > a DBUS interface to the e-d-s
> That has already been done: http://labs.o-hand.com/embedded-eds/
> 
> The problems are, as I was told, that it's pretty slow due to the 
> different API design. There is a lot of data being transferred forth and 
> back and D-Bus is not good in doing that. In order to take full 
> advantage of the D-Bus port, the e-d-s API would have to be redesigned. 
> But again, this is what I was told when I asked the same question. Other 
> may jump in and correct me where I'm wrong.

It's actually faster than EDS-ORBit.

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton                                 mail: ross burtonini com
                                          jabber: ross burtonini com
                                           www: http://burtonini.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]