Re: [xml] enhancing the error handling API

[Stefan Seefeld <seefeld sympatico ca>]

Daniel Veillard wrote:

>   You can have per parser context, I would keep that. For everything
> else at least the signature of an error callback will be unified.
>   The thing which annoys me the most with your mail is:
>       - it doesn't suggest anything
>       - the exact same points can be raised with the existing infrastructure
>   So what's the point ?

sorry if it didn't sound constructive. I meant to imply context specific
error handler signatures, something like this:

void document_parse_error(document *, position, error_code);
void xpath_parse_error(position, error_code);

etc.,

but I (now) understand that even in xpath expressions you may need
references to a document. Just to clarify my original point...

Stefan