Re: IPv6 default routes / NM vs. kernel autoconfig

[Phil Mayers <p mayers imperial ac uk>]

On 31/07/12 12:19, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> > > Default gateway selection is
> > > another.
> >
> > Do you intend multiple, simultaneous equal-cost gateways to be a
> > use-case here? Because that's a valid, often desirable use-case.
>
> I'm answering for myself. Currently not. We have other priorities
> but it may be reconsidered in the future.

Fair enough.

> > The whole area is complex, and interacts with RFC3484(bis)
> > destination
> > address selection, in particular rule 5.5 of 3484bis.
>
> We are in clash with some of the RFCs and some of them are even wrong. I'm
> dedicating *some* time working for improvement on both implementation and
> specification sides. Help appreciated.

Are the various conflicts/problems listed somewhere?