Re: [xslt] Performance Analysis

["Marc Adkins" <madkins whitepages com>]

Yes, that was a typo.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William M. Brack [mailto:wbrack mmm com hk] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:31 PM
> To: Marc Adkins
> Subject: Re: [xslt] Performance Analysis
> 
> Marc Adkins wrote:
> > We have been doing a performance comparison between a three 
> year old 
> > version of the LibXML / LibXSLT libraries and the latest version 
> > released by dVeillard with patches provided by wBrack.
> >
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > *	Alpha:
> > Our current production templates using the older libraries.
> > *	Bravo:
> > Updated templates that run without error with the newer libraries, 
> > tested against the newer libraries.
>                      ^^^^^
> I assume this was a typo, and that you meant "older"?
> 
> > *	Charlie:
> > Same updated templates tested against the newer libraries.
> >
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > 	Alpha		Bravo			Charlie
> > Avg CPU %	14.89		14.96	0.46%		15.39	3.34%
> > Interrupts/s	1545.65		1552.58	0.45%		
> 1573.41	1.80%
> > Memory	1738837		1739171	0.02%		1584031	-8.90%
> > IOps/s	13.81		13.98	1.26%		32.98	138.92%
> > Trans/s	46.19		46.41	0.47%		46.21	0.03%
> >
> 
> I've no idea why the higher I/O rate.  In fact, I would have 
> expected a significant drop because of the increased caching. 
>  I'm also surprised that the "Trans/s" hasn't improved.  
> Unfortunately, there's not much we can do to investigate, 
> since the source stylesheets and data are unavailable (not 
> complaining, just stating fact :-) ).
> 
> > Marc M. Adkins
> >
> 
> Bill
> 
>