Re: [xslt] Solaris 10 test failure with 1.1.15

[Albert Chin <libxslt mlists thewrittenword com>]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:11:18PM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:40:26AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > Any ideas on this test failure (works ok on RHEL 4/AMD64):
> 
>    Hum, hard ... we have our own date/time routines based on the
> XSD ones. Recompiling date.c in libexslt/ with DEBUG_EXSLT_DATE defined
> and testing on both systems may give a hint of what is going wrong.

Ok, patch below. Does ANSI define bit types as signed/unsigned? I
think they're unsigned by default. I'd suggest making all bittypes
signed or unsigned explicitly.

-- 
albert chin (china thewrittenword com)

-- snip snip
Index: libexslt/date.c
===================================================================
--- libexslt/date.c.orig	2004-11-08 09:35:03.000000000 -0600
+++ libexslt/date.c	2005-11-11 13:16:57.659095000 -0600
@@ -89,7 +85,7 @@
     unsigned int	min	:6;	/* 0 <=  min    <= 59	*/
     double		sec;
     unsigned int	tz_flag	:1;	/* is tzo explicitely set? */
-    int			tzo	:11;	/* -1440 <= tzo <= 1440 */
+    signed int		tzo	:11;	/* -1440 <= tzo <= 1440 */
 };
 
 /* Duration value */