RE: [xslt] Extending EXSLT support to get the crypto part



Would it be possible to completely remove the dependency, including from libexslt, if crypto is not required?
OpenSSL is huge and, I would imagine, irrelevent to 90% of XSL usage scenarios. It would be nice to be able keep the extensions without having to install OpenSSL.


Thanks,

Yuval


From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
Reply-To: veillard redhat com,The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list <xslt gnome org>
To: xslt gnome org
Subject: [xslt] Extending EXSLT support to get the crypto part
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:41:12 -0400


 See bug #142105
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142105

doing so will add dependancies for libexslt to openssl when available
and as a side effect xsltproc will also depend on those.
Being able to compile libxslt/xsltproc without openssl being available
is of course a very important goal even if this feature is added.
Is there strong opposition from doing so ?
I don't think having libxml2 depend on openssl is a good idea (c.f.
the thread about adding https support to libxml2) but libexslt is
a far more specialized library and doing so doesn't concern me.

  Unless serious concern being raised and once the configuration
stuff is being sorted out, I think I will make that change, so if
you have a strong feeling about this, please speak up :-)

Daniel

--
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
xslt gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]