Re: [xslt] Re: ancestor-or-self reverse axis bug

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 11:15:02AM -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> At 11:27 AM -0400 8/14/04, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> 
> >This is what the testuite expects, and it is what Xalan produces. My 
> >reading of the XPath spec is that they are correct and libxslt is 
> >wrong.
> 
> I misspoke a bit in my last message. The test suite output agrees 
> with libxslt. However, I still think Xalan is right and libxslt and 
> the test suite output are wrong here.

  Elliotte, I never received the mail you reference. It may has disapeared
in the SPAM filtering of the bounces on the mailing list. Make sure you're
posting from a subscribed address and please resend de message.

  thanks,

Daniel

P.S.: yes the greed of a few marketers managed to destroy all notion of 
      mail reliability in just a few years, extremely frustrating. That 
      and stupidities in a monopolist code, indead lead by greed too.

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/