Re: [xslt] segfaults & limits
- From: Pike <pike kw nl>
- To: xslt gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xslt] segfaults & limits
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 02:16:19 +0200
Hi
>>>>> lately, we're running into more and more segfaults.
>>>> I can't really do anything with such a report honnestly.
>> Is there no possibility to avoid segfaults in C?
:-)
from daniels response, i smell a sense of frustration :-)
let me just add that what libxml is doing sofar for us is
_incredably_good_,
we've just pushed things to limits, but these limits appear pretty high.
libxml rocks.
I kinda understand the problem in C, that's pretty hardcore..
a worthy discussion might be how to workaround such segfaults.
would increasing memory help ?
what are good alternatives to variable value-sets and
node-sets ? how would you do that in proper xslt1.0 ?
aren't document() statements just as 'dangerous' ?
$2c,
*pike
=======
+ give luck a chance
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]